Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632266›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2025

Experiences with and Practical Implications of Using a Hybrid Operating Room.

Matthias Gmeiner, Vanessa Mazanec, Michael Sonnberger, Andreas Gruber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias GmeinerKepler University Hospital Linz, Department of Neurosurgery, Linz, Austria. matthias.gmeiner@kepleruniversitätsklinikum.at.
Vanessa MazanecKepler University Hospital Linz, Medical Faculty, Linz, Austria.
Michael SonnbergerKepler University Hospital Linz, Medical Faculty, Linz, Austria.
Andreas GruberKepler University Hospital Linz, Department of Neurosurgery, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this chapter is to present our initial results of the use of a hybrid operating room (OR) in cerebrovascular procedures.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 152 patients who suffered from cerebrovascular pathology and were treated at the hybrid OR at the Department of Neurosurgery at Kepler University Hospital from April 2020 to October 2022 were included. Vascular pathologies and hybrid interventions were analyzed. Additionally, the number of residual aneurysms and vessel stenosis/occlusions was assessed.ResultsSpecifically, 106 patients were treated because of a cerebral aneurysm. In six cases, a residual aneurysm was identified. In another three cases, a stenosis/occlusion was found, and in three patients, a hybrid intervention was performed. These results indicate that about 10% of the patients might benefit from the treatment in a hybrid OR. Furthermore, 49 patients were treated for carotid stenosis/occlusion and 12 had an arteriovenous malformation or fistula.ConclusionNo procedure-related complications occurred in the observed cohort. The hybrid OR provided readily available, high-quality intraoperative imaging. Hybrid procedures increase the quality of care and patient safety. Furthermore, they might contribute to the reduction of intraoperative complications.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisIntracranial AneurysmIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsNeurosurgical ProceduresOperating RoomsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesComplex cerebrovascular pathologiesHybrid operating roomNeurovascular centerVascular neurosurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.