ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2025
Experiences with and Practical Implications of Using a Hybrid Operating Room.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid operating rooms for the treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A technical note.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this chapter is to present our initial results of the use of a hybrid operating room (OR) in cerebrovascular procedures.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 152 patients who suffered from cerebrovascular pathology and were treated at the hybrid OR at the Department of Neurosurgery at Kepler University Hospital from April 2020 to October 2022 were included. Vascular pathologies and hybrid interventions were analyzed. Additionally, the number of residual aneurysms and vessel stenosis/occlusions was assessed.ResultsSpecifically, 106 patients were treated because of a cerebral aneurysm. In six cases, a residual aneurysm was identified. In another three cases, a stenosis/occlusion was found, and in three patients, a hybrid intervention was performed. These results indicate that about 10% of the patients might benefit from the treatment in a hybrid OR. Furthermore, 49 patients were treated for carotid stenosis/occlusion and 12 had an arteriovenous malformation or fistula.ConclusionNo procedure-related complications occurred in the observed cohort. The hybrid OR provided readily available, high-quality intraoperative imaging. Hybrid procedures increase the quality of care and patient safety. Furthermore, they might contribute to the reduction of intraoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.