Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632253›Full record

Observational studyActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2025

The Forefront of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Our History of Treatment Optimisation Over 30 Years and the Modern Outcomes.

Yuki Shinya, Hirotaka Hasegawa, Motoyuki Umekawa, Masahiro Shin, Mariko Kawashima, Satoshi Koizumi, Atsuto Katano, Yuichi Suzuki, Taichi Kin, Nobuhito Saito

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuki ShinyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotaka HasegawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoyuki UmekawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko KawashimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi KoizumiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuto KatanoDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taichi KinDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhito SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can cause cerebral haemorrhage, associated morbidity, and mortality if left untreated. Therefore, prophylactic interventions are essential to manage these lesions. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience of incorporating new technologies into gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for AVMs, aiming to improve its effectiveness and safety.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study that included 1032 patients with AVMs who underwent GKRS at our institution from 1990 to 2022. We reviewed the detailed treatment techniques and updates on GKRS, including tractography-guided identification of critical white matter fibres for eloquent AVMs, GKRS with minimal targeting embolisation for high-haemorrhage risk AVMs, and rotational angiography based GKRS for all AVMs. We evaluated the GKRS outcomes for AVM obliteration, post-GKRS haemorrhage, survival, post-GKRS signal changes, and neurological preservation.

resultsWe collected data from 90 patients by using the most advanced techniques. The cumulative obliteration rates were 61.0% at 3 years and 81.6% at 4 years, and the cumulative post-GKRS haemorrhage rates were 2.2% at 2 years and 3.6% at 5 years. Post-GKRS haemorrhage resulted in mortality in one patient (1.1%). Post-GKRS signal change was observed in 31 patients (34%), but only one (1.0%) developed a neurological deficit. Therefore, the cumulative neurological preservation rate was 97.8% at 5 years.

conclusionsGKRS is a safe and effective treatment for AVMs. The continuous development and use of advanced techniques can lead to favourable outcomes for AVMs. However, further studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups, as well as an analysis of late adverse events, are necessary to better understand the efficacy and safety of GKRS for AVMs.

Indexed as

Intracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsRadiosurgeryAdolescentAdultAgedCerebral HemorrhageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBrain arteriovenous malformationGamma knife radiosurgeryStereotactic radiosurgeryTreatment history

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.