Observational studyActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2025
The Forefront of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Our History of Treatment Optimisation Over 30 Years and the Modern Outcomes.
Observational study in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can cause cerebral haemorrhage, associated morbidity, and mortality if left untreated. Therefore, prophylactic interventions are essential to manage these lesions. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience of incorporating new technologies into gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for AVMs, aiming to improve its effectiveness and safety.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study that included 1032 patients with AVMs who underwent GKRS at our institution from 1990 to 2022. We reviewed the detailed treatment techniques and updates on GKRS, including tractography-guided identification of critical white matter fibres for eloquent AVMs, GKRS with minimal targeting embolisation for high-haemorrhage risk AVMs, and rotational angiography based GKRS for all AVMs. We evaluated the GKRS outcomes for AVM obliteration, post-GKRS haemorrhage, survival, post-GKRS signal changes, and neurological preservation.
resultsWe collected data from 90 patients by using the most advanced techniques. The cumulative obliteration rates were 61.0% at 3 years and 81.6% at 4 years, and the cumulative post-GKRS haemorrhage rates were 2.2% at 2 years and 3.6% at 5 years. Post-GKRS haemorrhage resulted in mortality in one patient (1.1%). Post-GKRS signal change was observed in 31 patients (34%), but only one (1.0%) developed a neurological deficit. Therefore, the cumulative neurological preservation rate was 97.8% at 5 years.
conclusionsGKRS is a safe and effective treatment for AVMs. The continuous development and use of advanced techniques can lead to favourable outcomes for AVMs. However, further studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups, as well as an analysis of late adverse events, are necessary to better understand the efficacy and safety of GKRS for AVMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.