ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2025
Introducing Bayesian Analysis for Clinicians: Sex-Associated Risk Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntracranial aneurysms (IAs) are critical vascular defects potentially leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage. A Bayesian framework assists clinicians in assessing IA risks by evaluating multiple factors, including sex, due to its higher prevalence in women.
methodsThis study adopted the Bayesian theorem to quantify IA prevalence and the incidence of subsequent hemorrhage, examining sex as a pivotal risk factor for IA rupture stratification.
resultsThe Bayesian analysis revealed a greater incidence of IAs among women yet indicated that sex does not have a significant impact on the rupture risk in diagnosed patients. This finding suggests the necessity of considering other cofactors in risk evaluation.
conclusionsBayesian approaches provide clinicians with refined tools for IA risk assessment, emphasizing the complex interplay of various risk factors beyond sex. Acknowledging the limited influence of sex on rupture probability is crucial in guiding IA management. Continuous research is warranted to advance Bayesian methods, improving their clinical applicability and enhancing patient treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.