ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025
Incentives and practice improve prospective memory performance in older adults.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The functional neuroanatomy of event-based and time-based prospective memory, and its improvement.Communications biology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProspective memory can decline with age. Incentives or practice may improve it. Previous research indicated that avoiding financial losses may be more appealing for older adults than achieving financial gains.
aimsIn this study, we examined whether financial gains, financial losses, or practice will improve prospective memory performance in older adults. We included N = 132 healthy adults (60–80 years old, 35% female).
methodsWe used a between-subject factor ‘group’ (event-based or time-based prospective memory; financial gains or losses) and a within-subject factor ‘practice’ comprising 2 blocks (first or second half of task trials). All participants performed a 1-back task as an ongoing task and a prospective memory task embedded in the 1-back task. We used linear effects modelling to examine whether incentives or practice improved task accuracy, response times, or clock checking.
resultsThe prospect of financial losses accelerated event-based prospective memory responses and led to more strategic clock checking in the time-based prospective memory task compared to the prospect of financial gains. In addition, it accelerated ongoing task responses compared to financial gains. Practice, in contrast, only improved event-based prospective memory with no effect on time-based prospective memory.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of choosing an incentive adjusted to the performance outcome when designing studies that examine the influence of incentives or practice on prospective memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.