Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632163›Full record

ReviewSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2025

Towards standardized skin testing for drug-induced allergic reactions.

Moneerah AlGassim, Fatimah Alawami, Ghalia H Bakhsh, Samia Al-Shouli, Nada K Alhumaid, Abdullah A Alshehri, Fahad A Almughem, Yahya M K Tawfik, Rawan Fitaihi, Nasser D Aljohani and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Understanding Biologics in CRSwNP: Related Events and Insights.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Moneerah AlGassimMedical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah AlawamiMedical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghalia H BakhshPharmacy Services Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Samia Al-ShouliImmunology Unit, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nada K AlhumaidAdvanced Diagnostics and Therapeutics Institute, Health Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AlshehriAdvanced Diagnostics and Therapeutics Institute, Health Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad A AlmughemAdvanced Diagnostics and Therapeutics Institute, Health Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yahya M K TawfikDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rawan FitaihiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser D AljohaniMedical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah O AlshehryPharmacy Services Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. aoalshehry@kfmc.med.sa.
Essam A TawfikAdvanced Diagnostics and Therapeutics Institute, Health Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. etawfik@kacst.gov.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-3251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standardization of skin tests is essential for detecting allergen sensitization, confirming diagnoses, and guiding treatment of allergen-induced conditions. The rise in drug-induced reactions presents a challenge to healthcare practitioners, as incomplete or inaccurate drug allergy histories can compromise patient safety and result in medication errors. Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are akin to allergic responses, triggered by either the active ingredient or excipients in a drug. Distinguishing between a drug allergic reaction and a predictable adverse drug reaction (ADR) is vital in clinical practice. Cutaneous testing, a common diagnostic modality, uses non-irritant drug concentrations, tested and validated for key drug classes. This article collects up-to-date concentrations, serving as a reference for healthcare practitioners. These concentrations vary but are generally prepared by dissolving the commercial form of the drug's tablet or capsule content in normal saline, white petrolatum, or sterile water for irrigation. However, the lack of data and standardized protocols on optimal non-irritant drug concentrations for oral dosage forms has led to variability in these tests' sensitivity, specificity, and performance.

Indexed as

AllergyDrug allergic reactionDrug hypersensitivity reactionNon-irritant concentrationsSkin test

Identifiers

PMID40632163
PMCPMC12240923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.