ReviewSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2025
Towards standardized skin testing for drug-induced allergic reactions.
Review in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologics: Advances in Diagnosis and Management.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- Understanding Biologics in CRSwNP: Related Events and Insights.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- The Gap Between Suspected Local Anesthetic Allergy and Formal Diagnostic Evaluation.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- A Case of an Allergic Contact Dermatitis Following the Administration of Enoxaparin: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standardization of skin tests is essential for detecting allergen sensitization, confirming diagnoses, and guiding treatment of allergen-induced conditions. The rise in drug-induced reactions presents a challenge to healthcare practitioners, as incomplete or inaccurate drug allergy histories can compromise patient safety and result in medication errors. Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are akin to allergic responses, triggered by either the active ingredient or excipients in a drug. Distinguishing between a drug allergic reaction and a predictable adverse drug reaction (ADR) is vital in clinical practice. Cutaneous testing, a common diagnostic modality, uses non-irritant drug concentrations, tested and validated for key drug classes. This article collects up-to-date concentrations, serving as a reference for healthcare practitioners. These concentrations vary but are generally prepared by dissolving the commercial form of the drug's tablet or capsule content in normal saline, white petrolatum, or sterile water for irrigation. However, the lack of data and standardized protocols on optimal non-irritant drug concentrations for oral dosage forms has led to variability in these tests' sensitivity, specificity, and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.