ArticleNeuroradiology2025
MRI-based interpretable clinicoradiological and radiomics machine learning model for preoperative prediction of pituitary macroadenomas consistency: a dual-center study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning-based models for preoperative prediction of pituitary adenoma consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics-based prediction of pituitary adenoma consistency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pituitary adenomas (PitNETs): from imaging biomarkers to clinical translation.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish an interpretable and non-invasive machine learning (ML) model using clinicoradiological predictors and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features to predict the consistency of pituitary macroadenomas (PMAs) preoperatively.
methodsTotal 350 patients with PMA (272 from Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University and 78 from Daping Hospital of Army Medical University) were stratified and randomly divided into training and test cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. The tumor consistency was classified as soft or firm. Clinicoradiological predictors were examined utilizing univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Radiomics features were selected employing the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms. Logistic regression (LR) and random forest (RF) classifiers were applied to construct the models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analyses (DCA) were performed to compare and validate the predictive capacities of the models. A comparative study of the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) was performed. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) was applied to investigate the optimal model's interpretability.
resultsThe combined model predicted the PMAs' consistency more effectively than the clinicoradiological and radiomics models. Specifically, the LR-combined model displayed optimal prediction performance (test cohort: AUC = 0.913; ACC = 0.840). The SHAP-based explanation of the LR-combined model suggests that the wavelet-transformed and Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) filter features extracted from T
conclusionAn interpretable machine learning model incorporating clinicoradiological predictors and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-based radiomics features may predict PMAs consistency, enabling tailored and precise therapies for patients with PMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.