Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632041›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2025

Estimating the differential exposure of household groups to alcohol duty reforms in Great Britain.

Luke B Wilson, Rob Pryce, Grace Leeming, John Holmes, Colin Angus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luke B WilsonSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-5729
Rob PryceSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Grace LeemingSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
John HolmesSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Colin AngusSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR156679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe explored the potential impact of changes to the UK alcohol tax system implemented in August 2023 on increases on consumer spending, the separate impacts of the changes to the duty structures, and how these impacts vary between households depending on their level of alcohol purchasing and their socioeconomic position.

methodsWe used household-level purchasing data from Kantar's Worldpanel to analyse four alternative scenarios, reflecting the three separate components of the duty reforms (the changes to the duty structures, the temporary wine easement, and the additional 10.1% increase in duty rates).

resultsIn the 12 months prior to the implementation of the reforms, the average household spend on off-trade alcohol in Kantar's Worldpanel was £324.37 (August 2022-July 2023). This average conceals a heavily skewed distribution, with the lowest-purchasing 20% of households spending an average of £20.47 per year compared to £1206.68 for the highest-purchasing quintile. On average, households in higher socioeconomic position spend more on alcohol than those in lower socioeconomic positions-£339.19 compared to £302.37.

conclusionOur results provide support for the structural reforms to alcohol duty introduced in the UK being effectively targeted at the heaviest alcohol purchasers, with no evidence to suggest that they are likely to increase economic inequalities.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesFamily CharacteristicsTaxesHumansSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdomalcoholalcohol duty reformexposuresocioeconomic positiontax

Identifiers

PMID40632041
PMCPMC12669999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.