Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Cemiplimab in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Secondary Angiosarcomas (CEMangio): A Phase II Clinical Trial and Biomarker Analyses.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- How I treat soft tissue sarcomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- The effect of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on immune cell infiltrates in myxofibrosarcoma.Immuno-oncology technology · 2026Article
- Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Cutaneous Angiosarcoma, Particularly Focusing on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Cancers · 2025Review
- Recent advances in sarcoma therapy: new agents, strategies and predictive biomarkers.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAngiosarcomas (AS) are rare vascular sarcomas. Secondary AS (sAS) arise from DNA-damaging factors such as radiotherapy and UV radiation (UV-AS) or due to chronic lymphedema. The prognosis for advanced AS is poor, with limited treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibition is not approved for AS, but high intratumoral T-cell density and frequent mutations in sAS may support efficacy. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab (350 mg, intravenously every 3 weeks) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sAS using a Simon's two-stage design. The primary outcome was the best overall response rate within 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and predictive biomarkers for treatment response.
resultsEighteen patients (12 with AS from radiotherapy, 3 with UV-AS, and 3 with AS due to chronic lymphedema) were treated with cemiplimab. The best overall response rate was 27.8% (4 partial responses, 1 complete response), with a time to response of 2.6 months and a duration of response of 6.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 3.7 months, and the median overall survival was 13.1 months. Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 33.3% of patients. High tumor mutational burden was observed in three patients with UV-AS, two of whom showed a response. High intratumoral CD3+ (P = 0.019), CD4 (P = 0.046), CD8+ (P = 0.026), and FoxP3+ (P = 0.026) T-cell densities; low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.026); and Colidextribacter abundance were associated with response.
conclusionsCemiplimab shows promising effectivity in sAS and warrants further investigation. Promising predictive blood and tissue biomarkers were identified, indicating potential for improved patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.