ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2025
Flexible Depth Probes with PEDOT:PSS Microelectrodes for Chronic Recording and Stimulation.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Foreign Body Responses to Neural Electrodes and Surface Biofunctionalization Strategies for Interface Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Method for Patterning of Conductive Polymers on Flexible Substrates with Possible Applications for Wearable Sensing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- PEDOT:PSS in peripheral nerve injury repair: electrical stimulation, neural interfaces, and neural regenerative mechanisms.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flexible neural probes with conductive polymer electrodes present promising alternatives to rigid devices for chronic brain stimulation and recording. Organic devices, characterized by higher charge injection capabilities and better compatibility with biological tissues compared to inorganic probes, hold significant potential in this field. However, demonstrating stability and consistent physiological responses during prolonged pulsing is crucial for their practical application. Moreover, their implantation into brain tissue remains a challenge. Due to their small size and flexibility, organic devices are difficult to insert into brain tissue. This limits their widespread use for recording and deep stimulation of the brain. In this study, we fabricated plastic depth probes with PEDOT:PSS electrodes and developed a reliable protocol for their implantation into brain tissue using a stiff, removable shuttle. We implanted two identical probes into the hippocampus of an adult rat, targeting the CA1 layer with recording electrodes and Schaffer collaterals with stimulating electrodes. We demonstrated that these fabricated devices are excellent tools for recording not only the activity of the neuronal network but also individual neurons. Using microampere range electrical current pulses, we stimulated Schaffer collaterals in freely moving rats and recorded the electrophysiological responses of CA1 pyramidal cells over a 12 day period. Histological analysis of the implanted brain revealed that the lesions caused by our probes were significantly smaller than those left by metal electrodes. Thus, we demonstrated that flexible organic devices are highly effective tools for deep brain recording and stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.