ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Subtle Differences in Physician Communication and Substantial Impacts on Patient Decision-Making About Low-Value Care: An Experimental Vignette Study.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONAL, AIMS AND
objectivesWhile low-value care may have multiple contributing factors, it ultimately arises within patient-physician interactions, often influenced by communication. This study examines whether and the extent to which physician communication factors influence patients' willingness to undergo low-value care using hypothetical vignettes in South Korea.
methodsWe utilised data from a total of 1229 South Korean adults that included hypothetical vignettes on low-value care. Participants were presented with vignettes involving minor head injury and the potential use of computed tomography (CT). We assessed changes in the proportion of individuals willing to undergo low-value CT based on three physician communication factors: explicit recommendation, communication regarding test benefits and risks, and expressions indicative of defensive medicine, such as warning about missed problems and stating no legal responsibility. We also examined participant characteristics associated with their willingness to use low-value CT.
resultsDecisions regarding low-value care were significantly influenced by physician communication factors. For instance, while 68.5% of participants were willing to use low-value CT without explicit recommendation, 76.6% were willing when an explicit recommendation was made. Among those initially willing to use low-value CT without an explicit recommendation, 54.6% changed their decision and chose not to undergo the CT when presented with information on the risks and benefits. However, 69% of these individuals reversed their decision and opted for the CT when the vignette included elements indicative of defensive medicine. The willingness to use low-value care was not associated with most participant characteristics, except for supplementary private health insurance and individual preferences for health care.
conclusionsPhysician communication plays a pivotal role in patient decision-making regarding low-value care. To reduce low-value care, improving physician communication should be prioritised and considered a crucial leverage point in quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.