ArticlePsyCh journal2025
The Electrocortical Effects of Repurposing and Reconstrual on the Regulation of Disgust.
Article in PsyCh journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential responses to group and individual emotional voices: a behavioral and ERP study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Electrocortical Effects of Repurposing and Reconstrual on the Regulation of Disgust.PsyCh journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive reappraisal serves as a pivotal strategy in emotion regulation, encompassing techniques such as repurposing and reconstrual. However, the behavioral and temporal disparities between these two reappraisal subtypes remain underexplored. This study aims to delineate these differences by comparing the psychophysiological impacts of repurposing versus reconstrual on disgust emotion regulation, employing event-related potentials (ERPs) as the primary neurophysiological indicator. Behavioral data revealed that both strategies evoked significantly greater pleasure and less disgust compared to negative description conditions. Notably, repurposing elicited a more pronounced positive emotional shift. Electroencephalographic (EEG) findings indicated that repurposing led to a lower late positive potential (LPP) amplitude (1000-3000 ms) in frontal and parietal regions compared to reconstrual or negative descriptions. Furthermore, both strategies elicited larger left negativity component (LNC) amplitude (500-1000 ms) than negative descriptions, with repurposing demonstrating a prolonged LNC effect (1000-1500 ms) compared to reconstrual. This investigation confirms that although repurposing requires extended semantic processing resources, it exhibits superior efficacy in mitigating disgust responses. By providing direct empirical comparisons between these reappraisal modalities, the research advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive emotion regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.