Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631803›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Telehealth-Supported Home Oxygen Therapy on Adherence, Hospital Readmission, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Cuirong Hu, Xinqi Liao, Yi Fang, Shu Zhu, Xia Lan, Guilan Cheng

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cuirong Hu *Division of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China, 86 18980602084.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1887-7018
Xinqi Liao *Division of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China, 86 18980602084.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-7072
Yi FangDivision of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China, 86 18980602084.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2366-6078
Shu ZhuDivision of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China, 86 18980602084.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1062-3630
Xia LanDivision of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China, 86 18980602084.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7893-8440
Guilan ChengDivision of Internal Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China, 86 18980602084.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3950-6845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common respiratory disorder frequently requiring oxygen therapy to relieve symptoms and improve survival. In recent years, telehealth-supported interventions have emerged as promising strategies to optimize home oxygen therapy by promoting adherence, reducing hospitalizations, and enhancing health-related quality of life. However, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains inconsistent and equivocal, underscoring the need for further rigorous evaluation. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of telehealth-supported home oxygen therapy on adherence, hospital readmission, and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across 6 databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) up to October 1, 2024, and updated on April 28, 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving patients with COPD comparing telehealth-supported home oxygen therapy with usual care, and reporting outcomes on adherence, hospital readmissions, or health-related quality of life, were included. In addition, 2 reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evaluated the certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Meta-analyses and heterogeneity assessments were conducted using R software (R Core Team). Standardized mean differences with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the intervention effects under a random-effects model. Results: In total, 8 studies comprising 1275 patients were included in the review. Telehealth-supported home oxygen therapy significantly reduced hospital readmissions (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-0.40, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.21) and improved health-related quality of life (SMD=0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.73). No significant effect was observed on therapy adherence (SMD=0.19, 95% CI -0.76 to 1.14). Furthermore, 3 economic evaluations suggested that although telehealth interventions may incur higher initial costs, they are likely to result in long-term savings by reducing hospital admissions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings for hospital readmissions and health-related quality of life, for which the quality of evidence was rated as high, whereas the evidence for therapy adherence was rated as low. Conclusions: Telehealth-supported home oxygen therapy significantly reduces hospital admissions and improves health-related quality of life in patients with COPD, but does not significantly improve therapy adherence. Tailored interventions that consider patient demographics, combined with supportive policies, may further enhance clinical outcomes. Future research should incorporate economic evaluations to better inform policy decisions regarding the implementation of telehealth-supported home oxygen therapy. However, the overall certainty of evidence is limited by study-level risk of bias, variability in intervention designs, and imprecision of effect estimates, highlighting the need for further high-quality, standardized trials.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesOxygen Inhalation TherapyPatient CompliancePatient ReadmissionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeTelemedicineCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseeHealthhealth-related quality of lifehome oxygen therapyhospital readmissionmeta-analysispatient compliancePRISMA

Identifiers

PMID40631803
PMCPMC12262104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.