Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631652›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2025

Adolescents, Pornography Use, and Problematic Pornography Use: A Rapid Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.

Gemma Mestre-Bach, Marc N Potenza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Addiction Matters in Youth.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gemma Mestre-BachInstitute for Research, Transfer, and Innovation, International University of La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-0484
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-1354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This rapid systematic review aimed to examine longitudinal studies that assessed pornography and problematic pornography use and their associations with specific features in adolescents. Methods: This review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)guidelines. Longitudinal studies that examined pornography or problematic pornography use in adolescents were included. Results: Forty-four longitudinal studies were included. The main themes explored were 1) sexual behaviors; 2) sexual risk behaviors; 3) sexual satisfaction; 4) permissiveness; 5) sexual aggression, dating victimization, and rape myths; 6) academic performance; 7) COVID-19 pandemic; 8) religiosity; 9) psychopathology, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction; and 10) other factors such as desensitization to sexual content, age of first exposure, types of pornography consumed, and individual and contextual variables. The findings were heterogeneous, with some studies indicating significant association between pornography use and these variables, whereas in other areas, the results were inconsistent. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for further longitudinal research to clarify the relationship between types and patterns of pornography use in adolescents.

Indexed as

Addictive behaviorsAdolescentsCompulsive behaviorsCompulsive sexual behaviorsImpulse control disordersLongitudinal studiesPornographyProblematic pornography use

Identifiers

PMID40631652
PMCPMC12223668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.