ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
A Proposal for Addressing Bioethical Concerns Along the 10-Step Framework for Community Engagement.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBuilding trust by applying an ethical deliberation approach can increase Black/African American participation in clinical and translational community-engaged research (CEnR). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe provide examples of case studies from the literature to identify ethical issues associated with each step of the 10-Step Framework. To address these ethical issues, we applied an ethical deliberation approach embodied in three moments: (1) broadening and deepening the understanding of the situation and/or research scenarios, (2) envisioning action scenarios for more trustworthy research, and (3) coming to a judgement based on the comparative evaluation of scenarios.
resultsExamples of ethical issues identified include a lack of shared decision-making on proposed research topics, lengthy periods for data analysis and reporting that frustrate partners who want more timely results, and the lack of privacy, confidentiality and non-compliance with consent permissions for the dissemination of results.
conclusionWe recommend tailoring the ethical deliberation approach to any project dealing with ethical issues and conducting empirical studies to test this approach in CEnR. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: As part of a community-engaged research (CEnR) project, this paper benefited from the contribution of F.L., a member of a community organisation, as a co-author. This author was actively involved in contributing to the review of ethical issues in community-engaged research and how the ethical deliberation approach can contribute to addressing these ethical issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.