ArticleJournal of gastric cancer2025
Patients' Preferences for Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study on Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategies.
Article in Journal of gastric cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What drives patients' preferences for cancer care in South Korea's capital area? A study on preferences concerning cancer care facilities.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDecisions regarding gastric cancer treatment affect patient outcomes and quality of life (QOL); nonetheless, factors influencing patient preferences remain unclear. This study investigated the preferences for the extent of gastrectomy, minimally invasive surgery, and adjuvant therapy while identifying the key determinants. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional survey of 240 respondents, including patients with gastric cancer and the general population, assessed their preferences for the extent of gastrectomy, surgical modality, adjuvant therapy, palliative systemic therapy, and endoscopic therapy. Correlations between demographic variables and treatment choices were statistically analyzed.
resultsPatients prioritized expert recommendations for determining the extent of gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer and selecting the surgical modality, with recurrence risk and surgical complications being the primary considerations. In terms of adjuvant therapy, a 12-month oral regimen was preferred over a 6-month oral plus injection regimen, with survival benefit being the most valued factor. Conversely, QOL was a primary concern in palliative therapy. With respect to incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection, electrocauterization was the preferred approach, followed by surgical resection; local recurrence risk was assigned with the highest priority, followed by concerns regarding lymph node metastasis. Men and individuals living alone had a lower risk of recurrence and lymph node metastasis. Patients undergoing gastric cancer treatment preferred shorter procedures, whereas medical personnel emphasized surgical safety and efficiency.
conclusionsDemographic and clinical factors significantly influence patient preferences. Understanding these preferences is essential for shared decision-making and personalized oncological care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.