Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631465›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2025

Agency in Family Planning: A Scoping Review of the Measurement of Agency in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Francine Wood, Courtney McLarnon, Sarah Smith, Nitya Yerabandi, Lotus McDougal

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Courtney McLarnon
Sarah Smith
Nitya Yerabandi
Lotus McDougal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving women's agency in family planning is an integral component of empowerment, requiring culturally relevant, reliable, and valid measures. Measuring agency-action towards the achievement of self-determined goals-is key to tracking progress as highlighted by its inclusion in the Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, agency measurement within low- and middle-income contexts has all too often involved applying measures developed and tested in high-income contexts, and conceptual confusion has also led to both overlapping measures and those that omit key facets of agency. To examine the construction and application of agency measures in family planning research and programs, we conducted a scoping review of studies in low-and middle-income countries. Of 9,289 articles and abstracts screened, 72 met our inclusion criteria and included family planning outcomes. We identified 58 unique measures. Most measures were summative and described psychometric testing. Measures often included family planning-specific items, generally focused on contraceptive use with less attention to areas such as communication, access to services, or fertility timing. While increased interest in measuring family planning agency is evident, inconsistencies in measurement hinder cross-contextual comparisons. As family planning research and programs adopt empowerment-focused benchmarks, validated measures of agency are needed to accurately assess impact.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEmpowermentFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID40631465
PMCPMC12501686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.