ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Left ventricular concentric remodeling is highly common among veterans deployed to Southwest Asia and is associated with impaired exercise performance.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory symptoms and pulmonary physiologic outcomes among post-9/11 veterans with blast exposure.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Left ventricular concentric remodeling is highly common among veterans deployed to Southwest Asia and is associated with impaired exercise performance.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left ventricular concentric remodeling (LVCR), a pathological process of adaptive myocardial change, may be a precursor state for systolic and diastolic dysfunction and LV hypertrophy. Potential cardiotoxic airborne hazards present in combat zones in excess may increase the risk for adverse cardiac remodeling in deployed veterans. One hundred and thirty-nine deployed veterans were included in this study and underwent evaluations including transthoracic echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Relative wall thickness was used to classify LV geometry as normal, concentric or eccentric hypertrophy, or LVCR. Observed rates of LVCR were compared to those reported in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), and CPET results were compared between those with and without LVCR. Rates of LVCR in our veteran sample (12%-34%) were elevated compared to FHS (8%-21%), despite similar demographics and risk factors. Veterans with LVCR had reduced exercise capacity, greater ventilatory inefficiency, and increased heart rate reserve relative to those without. Deployment length was associated with increased odds of having LVCR (aOR = 1.04, 95% CI [1.01, 1.07]). Abnormal LV geometry, specifically LVCR, was common in our veteran sample and exceeded historical civilian rates. The presence of LVCR was associated with impaired exercise performance and was more likely in those with longer deployment lengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.