Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631347›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Outcomes of a pilot microrandomized trial of just-in-time adaptive intervention messages nudging weight-related behaviors in young adults.

Carmina G Valle, Brooke T Nezami, Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea, Karen E Hatley, Deborah F Tate

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03836391 (Precision Public Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03836391 nacompletednot on this map

Precision Public Health: Enhancing Connections to Develop Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention Strategies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2019 to 2019Enrolled53ConditionsOverweight and Obesity, Overweight, ObesityArmsNudge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmina G ValleDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1985-2409
Brooke T NezamiDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-7026
Nisha Gottfredson O'SheaHealth of Populations Division, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-7179
Karen E HatleyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7708-5714
Deborah F TateDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-5308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There is limited evidence on the effects of various types of intervention messages on achievement of daily behavioral goals in mobile weight loss programs. Nudge, a 12-week pilot microrandomized trial among young adults, tested whether 7 types of intervention messages based on behavior change techniques (BCTs) increased the likelihood of daily goal achievement. Methods: Participants received lessons, tailored feedback, self-monitoring tools, and daily messages, and had daily behavioral goals (weighing, active minutes goal, and red foods limit). Four times/day, participants (N = 52, aged 18-35, body mass index 25-40 kg/m Results: Randomization to receive any message (vs. none) did not impact likelihood of meeting daily goals overall but was associated with fewer red foods tracked (odds ratio (OR) = .96; 95% confidence interval (CI): .94-.98). Randomization to receive (vs. not receive) a social comparison message about red foods was associated with fewer red foods tracked (OR = .92; 95% CI: .85-.99); no other message types were associated with daily goal achievement. Receiving and viewing any message (vs. not viewing) increased odds of achieving daily goals for all 3 behaviors: weighing (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.06-3.43), active minutes (OR = 1.63; 95% CI:1.20-2.20), and red foods limit (OR = 2.09; 95% CI:1.46-3.01). Conclusions: BCT-based messages may nudge achievement of daily goals when participants view them. Further research should explore how to increase and maintain engagement in mobile behavioral interventions. Trial registration: Precision Public Health: Enhancing Connections to Develop Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention Strategies (Nudge); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03836391; ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03836391.

Indexed as

goalsjust-in-time adaptive interventionmHealthMicrorandomized trialweight

Identifiers

PMID40631347
PMCPMC12235231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.