ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Optimizing bacteriophage screening and isolation methods for microbial samples derived from different body sites of cattle.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophages are gaining increased research attention as alternatives to antibiotics and microbiome manipulation tools to enhance feed efficiency and animal health in cattle. However, challenges associated with phage specificity, microbial ecosystem variations, and the absence of effective screening methods have hindered harnessing the power of phage application in cattle. The objectives of this study were to (i) optimize phage screening method for microbial samples obtained from different cattle body sites, (ii) isolate lytic phages against key bovine pathogens and commensal bacteria, and (iii) characterize the isolated phages and their bacterial hosts. A total of 1,214 samples from different cattle body sites (n = 1194) and environmental sources were screened using 13 phage detection methods, including one high-throughput approach. Eighty-three phages were isolated, primarily from ruminal fluid (59), feces (15), vaginal (7) and nasopharyngeal swabs (1), and fetal ruminal fluid (1). The bacterial hosts inhibited by these phages were from 29 genera, with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.