Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631247›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Back-projection improves inference from sparsely sampled genomic surveillance data.

Elizabeth E Finney, Brian Lee, Syed Faraz Ahmed, Muhammad Saqib Sohail, Ahmed Abdul Quadeer, Matthew R McKay, John P Barton

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth E FinneyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, USA.
Brian LeeDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, USA.
Syed Faraz AhmedDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Muhammad Saqib SohailDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University, Lahore 54600, Pakistan.
Ahmed Abdul QuadeerDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5295-9067
Matthew R McKayDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John P BartonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1467-421X

Funding

Methods for quantifying selection in evolving populationsR35GM138233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BARTON, JOHN P · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants have emerged throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, driving new waves of infections. Genomic surveillance data can provide insights into the virus's evolution and biology. However, delayed and limited regional data can introduce biases in epidemiological models, potentially obscuring transmission patterns. To address this issue, we used a novel, variant-specific back-projection model to estimate a distribution of likely infection times from sample collection times. We combined this approach with epidemiological modeling to estimate selection for increased transmission in a way that accounts for the uncertainty in infection times. Tests in simulations demonstrated that our method can make the inference of selection more reliable. We also applied our approach to SARS-CoV-2 data, where it excelled in smoothing and extending data from geographic regions or times with poor sampling. Overall, our method can aid in the reliable identification of mutations and variants with higher transmission rates.

Identifiers

PMID40631247
PMCPMC12236715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.