ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Groove architecture controls lipid scrambling in simulations of protein and model systems.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipid bilayers are essential to life as they surround most cells and membrane-bound organelles. The integrity and fate of cells depend on the asymmetric makeup of lipid bilayers with various membrane proteins regulating the lipid composition of a bilayer's two leaflets. Lipids scramblases are one of the primary regulators of lipid asymmetry in bilayers, spontaneously transferring lipids between membrane leaflets. Members of the TMEM16, OSCA/TMEM63, and TMC families have been suggested to be lipid scramblases. Despite significant differences, these proteins share a common structural architecture that features a membrane-exposed groove. The "credit card" mechanism proposes that lipids switch leaflets by moving their polar head groups either inside (partially dry) or on the surface of (wet) membrane-exposed, open hydrophilic grooves. However, emerging evidence of closed-groove scrambling challenges this model. Given the sequence diversity of groove-lining amino acids in TMEM16, OSCA/TMEM63, and TMC proteins, we hypothesized that lipid scrambling is primarily determined by groove architecture. To test this hypothesis and the credit card mechanism, we used coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of experimental structures and AlphaFold-generated models of six different scramblases in closed and open states. In these simulations, we observed little scramblase activity in most closed-state configurations but robust scrambling by all open-state models. We then built simplified TMEM16-based scramblases with only three bead types uniformly set for solvent-facing, transmembrane, and groove regions. We used this and further simplified models to vary groove surface hydrophilicity, groove surface geometry, and groove architecture. Our models support the partially dry and wet credit card mechanisms and suggest that groove architecture plays a more important role in facilitating lipid scrambling than the detailed sequence of groove-lining amino acids.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.