Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631226›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

A

Ali Osman Berk Şapcı, Siavash Mirarab

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali Osman Berk ŞapcıORCID 0000-0003-4396-817X

Funding

Biology-aware machine learning methods for characterizing microbiome genotype and phenotypeR35GM142725 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MIR ARABBAYGI, SIAVASH · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing each sequencing read in a sample to large databases of known genomes has become a fundamental tool with wide-ranging applications, including metagenomics. These comparisons can be based on read-to-genome alignment, which is relatively slow, especially if done with the high sensitivity needed to characterize queries without a close representation in the reference dataset. A more scalable alternative is assigning taxonomic labels to reads using signatures such as k-mer presence/absence. A third approach is placing reads on a reference phylogeny, which can provide a far more detailed view of the read than a single label. How-ever, phylogenetic placement is currently only possible at scale for marker genes, constituting a small fraction of the genome. No current method is able to place all reads originating from anywhere in the genome on an ultra-large reference phylogeny. In this paper, we introduce krepp, an alignment-free k-mer-based method that enables placing reads from anywhere on the genome on an ultra-large reference phylogeny by first computing a distance from each read to every reference genome. To compute these distances and placements, krepp uses a host of algorithmic techniques, including locality-sensitive hashing to allow inexact k-mer matches, k-mer coloring graphs to map k-mers to reference genomes, maximum likelihood distance estimation, and likelihood ratio test for placement. Our experiments show that krepp is extremely scalable, improving on alignment by up to roughly 10×, computes very accurate distances that approximate those using alignments, and produces highly accurate placements. When used in the metagenomics context, the precise phylogenetic identifications provided by krepp improve our ability to compare and differentiate samples from different environments.

Identifiers

PMID40631226
PMCPMC12236853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.