ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Sensitivity of genome-wide tests for mitonuclear genetic incompatibilities.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mismatches between interacting mitochondrial and nuclear gene products in hybrids have been proposed to disproportionately contribute to the formation of early species boundaries. Under this model, genetic incompatibilities emerge when mitochondrial haplotypes are placed into a cellular context without their coevolved nuclear-encoded mitochondrial (n-mt) proteins. Although there is strong evidence that mitonuclear coevolution has contributed to reproductive isolation in some cases, it is less clear how far-reaching the effects of mitonuclear incompatibilities are in speciation. Does disrupting co-adapted mitonuclear genotypes have broad, genome-wide effects with numerous n-mt loci contributing to reproductive isolation? We leverage a system with several hybridizing species pairs (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.