Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40631151›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

MarkerMatch: A Proximity-Based Probe-Matching Algorithm for Joint Analysis of Copy-Number Variants from Different Genotyping Arrays.

Franjo Ivankovic, Dongmei Yu, James Shen, Lingyu Zhan, Maria Niarchou, Ariadne Kaylor, Laura Domènech, Tyne W Miller-Fleming, Luz M Porras, Paola Giusti-Rodríguez and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Franjo IvankovicCenter for OCD, Anxiety, and Related Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.ORCID 0000-0002-6776-8626
Dongmei YuStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0001-7901-4365
James ShenCenter for OCD, Anxiety, and Related Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.ORCID 0009-0007-3406-3025
Lingyu ZhanCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024.ORCID 0000-0001-6718-878X
Maria NiarchouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 32703.ORCID 0000-0002-8855-7393
Ariadne KaylorStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0009-0003-9576-8679
Laura DomènechStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-0824
Tyne W Miller-FlemingDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 32703.ORCID 0000-0002-0398-5162
Luz M PorrasCenter for OCD, Anxiety, and Related Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.ORCID 0000-0002-0162-4494
Paola Giusti-RodríguezCenter for OCD, Anxiety, and Related Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.ORCID 0000-0002-1921-1305
Roel A OphoffCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024.ORCID 0000-0002-8287-6457
Jeremiah M ScharfStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142.ORCID 0000-0002-4742-5896
Carol A MathewsCenter for OCD, Anxiety, and Related Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, McKnight Brain Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-7058

Funding

Integrating Common and Rare Variation to Discover Genes Associated with Tourette SyndromeR01NS102371 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MATHEWS, CAROL A, OPHOFF, ROEL A · 2018 to 2022
$7.4M
Joint genomic and statistical analyses of schizophrenia and bipolar to decipher genetic susceptibilityR01MH115676 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Roel A Ophoff, Bogdan Pasaniuc · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
4/4 Powering Genetic Discovery for Severe Mental Illness in Latin American and African AncestriesU01MH125042 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B., LOPEZ JARAMILLO, CARLOS · 2020 to 2024
$5.3M
Large-Scale Collaborative Genetic and Epigenetic Studies of Tourette SyndromeR01NS105746 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MATHEWS, CAROL A, PASCHOU, PERISTERA · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Interdisciplinary Training in Movement Disorders and NeurorestorationT32NS082168 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Melissa Jo Armstrong, David E Vaillancourt · 2015 to 2026
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115676NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH125042NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102371NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105746NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS082168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Copy-number variants (CNVs) are a form of genetic structural variation with increasing importance in complex human disorders. Both DNA sequencing and microarray data can be used to call CNVs, which can be used in association tests, such as association between CNV number and disease status. Unlike genotypes, CNV detection in microarrays requires the use of observed intensity signals at each probe, which limits the imputability for analyses that span multiple array types. Thus far, a consensus set of probes (the intersection encompassing the probes that occur in common on all arrays) has been used to circumvent the problem of differing array-specific sensitivities. This has, however, led to excessive reduction in overall sensitivity of CNV calls as arrays can have an undesirably low overlap of probe sets. To overcome this limitation, we developed MarkerMatch, a proximity-based algorithm that matches probes across different genotyping microarrays to maximize the number of probes considered in the CNV calling algorithm, thereby increasing the resolution and sensitivity while preserving precision. Results: By analyzing CNV calls from 4,906 individuals genotyped across three different arrays (Global Screening Array, Omni2.5 array, and Omni Express Exome array), we show that the MarkerMatch approach improves sensitivity by increasing the density of probes available for CNV calling while maintaining precision or improving it relative to the current practice (e.g., use of consensus probes only). We further demonstrate that MarkerMatch exceeds the output from current practice in terms of F1 score, Fowlkes-Mallows index, and Jaccard index. We also optimize MarkerMatch parameters,

Identifiers

PMID40631151
PMCPMC12236774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.