ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Neurological Tissue Dissection Techniques in Mouse Models for Reproducible Scientific Results: Brain, Spinal Cord, CSF, and Sciatic Nerve.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical research studies, specifically regarding human neurodegenerative diseases, are bound by ethical challenges, and have limited diagnostic and treatment options. Transgenic mouse models offer an incredible research advantage to conduct feasible and practical research with the ability to precisely define the progression of neurodegenerative disease over a wellcontrolled dosage and timeline. The use of transgenic mouse models has been extensive and is critical to advancing research in many ways, including understanding brain morphology and general tissue changes caused by neurological diseases. Often, these studies require specific brain regions or other neurological tissues which may be difficult to obtain. Unfortunately, specific extraction and dissection protocols are few and far between, leading to inconsistent results and a lack of reproducibility. A well-defined protocol, such as this, is instrumental in overcoming these obstacles and acquiring better experimental results. Five mouse-specific protocols are described: brain extraction, brain microdissection, spinal cord extrusion, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) collection, and sciatic nerve dissection. Each protocol was completed under biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) guidelines, similar to the sterility precautions required in human surgery. Each protocol also includes a collective materials list that defines proper instruments and usage. The protocol was refined based on feedback from numerous research studies in transcriptomics and pharmaceutical development. These applications require minimizing tissue damage, dissection accuracy, and the ability to reproduce the results-skills that are also directly transferable to clinical settings. The proper implementation of these protocols will allow for more accurate and precise results with reduced variability. This study provides well-defined, succinct, accessible protocols that are more ethical and improve the overall quality of the conducted research. By addressing this need, it supports greater advancements in many cross disciplinary areas.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.