ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
NANOME: A Nextflow pipeline for haplotype-aware allele-specific consensus DNA methylation detection by nanopore long-read sequencing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanopore long-read sequencing has expanded the capacity of long-range, single-base, and single-molecule DNA-methylation (DNAme) detection and haplotype-aware allele-specific epigenetic phasing. Previously, we benchmarked and ranked the robustness of seven computational tools for DNAme detection using nanopore sequencing. The top performers were Megalodon, Nanopolish, DeepSignal and Guppy. However, these algorithms exhibit lower performance at regions with discordant non-singleton DNAme patterns compared to genome-wide regions. Furthermore, long-read sequencing analysis of mammalian genomes requires higher computational resources than next-generation sequencing. To address these issues, we developed a NANOpore Methylation (NANOME) a consensus DNAme predictive model using XGBoost, which integrates the output of Megalodon, Nanopolish, and Deepsignal for analyzing data obtained using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). NANOME enhanced DNAme detection precision (mean square error) at single-base resolution by 11% and improved accuracy (F1-score) at single-molecule resolution by 2.4% for human B-lymphocyte European cell lines (NA12878). The consensus model also detected ~200,000 more CpGs than all three tools. Combing variant calling and long-read phasing, NANOME can detect haplotype-aware allele-specific DNAme in known imprinting controls in resolved and previously unresolved regions. We conducted haplotype-aware methylation detection on the T2T genome for dataset NA12878, revealing significant variations in differentially methylated region (DMR) density between gap and non-gap regions. Overall, NANOME represents a significant step forward in DNAme detection and long-range epigenetic phasing, offering a robust and accessible tool for researchers studying the epigenome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.