ArticleJTCVS open2025
Valve-sparing root replacement: How old is too old?
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Although typically offered in young patients, VSRR is performed over a wide age range, including into the eighth decade of life. This study analyzed the influence of age and preoperative comorbidities on operative outcomes, reoperation, and survival following VSRR. Methods: From 2004 to 2021, 780 patients underwent VSRR in an academic database. VSRR was performed using the David V reimplantation technique. A discriminating age cutoff for the effect of age on long-term survival was determined by Contal and O'Quigley methods and patients were divided into 2 groups based on age at time of surgery. Results: The optimal age cutoff for patients undergoing VSRR was found to be 65 years; 16% were aged 65 years or older at time of surgery. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 1.5% and was significantly higher among the group of patients older than age 65 years (4.1% vs 1.1%; Conclusions: VSRR can be performed with low operative mortality and excellent freedom from reoperation across age groups. In patients aged 65 years and older, serious consideration should be given when deciding on VSRR, especially in the setting of aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.