ArticleJTCVS open2025
Biomechanical modeling of surgical techniques to repair isolated segmental P2 prolapse of the mitral valve.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Respect and resect: The art of balance in mitral valve repair.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prolapse of the P2 cusp of the mitral valve is a common valvular lesion that is amenable to surgical repair. Both resective and nonresective leaflet repair procedures are used, yielding good acute correction of the valve lesion, but with variable resulting valve kinematics and mechanics. In this study, we used a patient-specific computational model of isolated P2 prolapse without excess tissue to assess the mechanical and anatomical benefits of different surgical techniques. Methods: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram of the mitral valve from a patient with segmental P2 prolapse was segmented and computationally modeled to serve as the disease model. Virtual repair was performed using neochordoplasty, triangular resection, and quadrangular resection. All techniques were accompanied by the addition of true-sized and downsized complete annuloplasty rings. Mitral valve closure was simulated for each repair, and the resulting systolic leaflet geometry, leaflet mobility, leaflet stresses, and chordal forces were computed. Results: From complete loss of coaptation pre-repair, Coaptation length was restored to 5.8 mm with 2 neochordae, 5.9 mm with 4 neochordae, 2.8 mm with triangular resection, and 1.7 mm with quadrangular resection and a true-sized annuloplasty. Peak stress in the repaired P2 segment was initially 0.75 MPa, reduced to 0.47 MPa with 2 neochordae and 0.39 MPa with 4 neochordae, but increased to 0.79 MPa with triangular resection and 2.04 MPa with quadrangular resection. Smaller rings reduced these stresses and further increased coaptation length in all investigated repair scenarios, but with a positive effect of such downsizing being larger with neochordoplasty than resective techniques. Conclusions: In the setting of isolated segmental P2 prolapse, preserving leaflet tissue with neochordae achieved largest leaflet coaptation with lowest leaflet stresses, whereas resective techniques restored smaller coaptation with less stress reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.