ArticleJTCVS open2025
The Ross/Ross-Konno operation in neonates and infants: A salvage strategy and a durable repair.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review a single-center experience of the Ross operation in neonates and infants with severe aortic valve disease. Methods: Retrospective review identified patients younger than age 1 year who underwent Ross operation between 2010 and 2024. Primary outcome was cumulative incidence of death with transplant as a competing risk. Early and midterm outcomes were analyzed, including postoperative complications and reinterventions. A subgroup analysis of patients who remained hospitalized until Ross procedure was performed. Median follow-up was 5.7 years (interquartile range, 2.9-8.8. years). Results: Twenty-nine patients (5 neonates and 24 infants) underwent the Ross operation, 24 (82.8%) of whom had a Konno procedure. Median age was 3.5 months (interquartile range, 1.1-5.7 months). Median weight was 4.9 kg (interquartile range, 3.9-6.0 kg). Five patients (27.2%) were born with isolated critical aortic stenosis, whereas 24 patients had other complex left-sided lesions. Twenty-five patients (86.2%) had prior aortic or aortic valve procedures: 14 balloon valvuloplasty, 3 open valvotomy, 1 surgical valve repair, 8 interrupted arch repairs, 5 coarctation or arch repairs, and 2 subaortic stenosis repairs. A subset (n = 11) could not be discharged from the hospital, mostly due to residual valve disease after balloon dilation, and underwent salvage Ross. Nineteen patients (65.5%) had concomitant operations. There was 1 in-hospital and 1 late mortality. Two patients required transplant. At follow-up, 1 patient had moderate or greater neoaortic insufficiency requiring reintervention. Conclusions: The Ross operation can be performed in neonates and infants with excellent midterm outcomes. This operation can be safely offered as an exit strategy in neonates and infants with residual aortic valve disease who are unable to be discharged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.