ArticleJTCVS open2025
Global surgery interest and engagement in Canadian thoracic surgery practice.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Thoracic pathologies pose a substantial health burden in low- and middle-income countries. Compounding the high incidence of these conditions, a global shortage and unequal distribution of surgical professionals exacerbate morbidity, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years in these regions. Global thoracic surgery aims to address these disparities. This study explores the interest, engagement, and perceived importance of global surgical care among Canadian thoracic surgeons. Methods: A self-administered electronic survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgery. The survey assessed perceptions of global surgery, willingness to engage in international collaborations, institutional resources, and barriers to participation. Results: Thirty-three practicing thoracic surgeons participated, most of whom worked in academic centers (23 out of 33 [69.7%]). A majority (30 out of 33 [90.9%]) believed international collaboration enhances thoracic surgery. Although 48.5% (16 out of 33) were willing to travel abroad to support surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries, and an equal percentage expressed interest in research addressing low- and middle-income countries' needs, only 21.2% (7 out of 33) had prior involvement in global thoracic surgery. Key barriers included a lack of institutional support (26 out of 33 [78.8%]), limited formal collaborative opportunities (26 out of 33 [78.8%]), inadequate funding (30 out of 33 [90.9%]), and an absence of recognized pathways for career development in global surgery (29 out of 33 [87.9%]). Conclusions: Canadian thoracic surgeons have a keen interest in global surgical initiatives; however, they face significant barriers in institutional support, resources, and accessibility of collaborative opportunities. Tackling these challenges through strengthened institutional policies, directed funding, and the establishment of a dedicated national network may enhance engagement in global thoracic surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.