Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630927›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2025

Utilizing Podocyte Foot Process Morphology for the Identification of Diabetic Nephropathy with or without Minimal Change Disease: Establishment of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnostic Model.

Xiangmeng Li, Peihua Zhang, Shimin Jiang, Shunlai Shang, Jiao Zhang, Jinyu Liu, Chenchen Li, Yan Gao, Haisong Zhang, Wenge Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A New Quantitative Metric for Precise Classification of Diabetic Podocyte Injury Using Scanning Electron Microscopy.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiangmeng LiDepartment of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1263-5495
Peihua ZhangSchool of Big Data Science, Hebei Finance University, Baoding, Hebei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-5715-9458
Shimin JiangDepartment of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5265-7395
Shunlai ShangDepartment of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6785-7717
Jiao ZhangGraduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jinyu LiuGraduate School, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chenchen LiKey Laboratory of Bone Metabolism and Physiology in Chronic Kidney Disease of Hebei Province, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Yan GaoKey Laboratory of Bone Metabolism and Physiology in Chronic Kidney Disease of Hebei Province, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, People's Republic of China.
Haisong ZhangKey Laboratory of Bone Metabolism and Physiology in Chronic Kidney Disease of Hebei Province, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-0567-3673
Wenge LiDepartment of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to differentiate whether diabetic nephropathy (DN) is complicated by minimal change disease (MCD) through the differences in podocyte foot process morphology, and subsequently establish an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted (AI-assisted) Diagnostic Model through machine learning of renal tissue electron microscopy images. Methods: Patients diagnosed with DN with nephrotic syndrome and treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2023 were selected. Patients were divided into the DN group and the DN with MCD group (DN+MCD group). Podocyte morphology's diagnostic value was assessed by measuring foot process width and quantifying slit diaphragm changes via Nephrin immunohistochemical staining. This study pioneers developing a machine learning-powered diagnostic model based on renal electron microscopy imaging to differentiate DN cases with or without concurrent MCD. Results: In 51 patients, DN+MCD patients exhibited wider podocyte foot processes and reduced Nephrin expression compared to DN. A total of 622 electron microscopy images were used for model establishment and internal validation, while 225 electron microscopy images were used for external validation. A model based on Mobilenetv2 was successfully established, achieving a maximum accuracy of 93.3% in differentiating whether DN is complicated by MCD using a single image. When at least 11 random images were input, stable reports were obtained with an accuracy of 98%. External validation showed that the model had good sensitivity and specificity in differentiating whether DN is complicated by MCD (100%, 83.33%). Conclusion: Podocyte foot process morphology has diagnostic value in differentiating whether DN is complicated by MCD. Our AI model addresses the unmet clinical need for reliable differentiation between DN with and without concurrent MCD. Additionally, it establishes a foundational framework for AI-powered analysis of renal imaging data to improve disease diagnosis and prognosis prediction.

Indexed as

diabetic nephropathyfoot process widthmachine learningminimal change diseasepodocyteslit diaphragm

Identifiers

PMID40630927
PMCPMC12236467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.