ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Using explainable machine learning and eye-tracking for diagnosing autism spectrum and developmental language disorders in social attention tasks.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph Neural Networks and sequential architectures for autism detection from eye-tracking biomarkers: a multi-site study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Home-based eye tracking for early autism screening: a scoping review of approaches, evidence, and implementation challenges.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Preserved and non-preserved social attentional processes in Autism and developmental language disorder at early ages.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of AI-Based Approaches for Detecting Autism Traits Using Voice and Behavioral Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eye-tracking technology has proven to be a valuable tool in detecting visual scanning patterns associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Its advantages in easily obtaining reliable measures of social attention could help overcome many of the current challenges in the assessment of neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the clinical use of this technology has not yet been established. Two key challenges must be addressed: the difficulty in reliably distinguishing between disorders with overlapping features, and the efficient management of eye-tracking data to yield clinically meaningful outcomes. Purpose: The aim of this study is to apply explainable machine learning (XML) algorithms to eye-tracking data from social attention tasks involving children with ASD, developmental language disorder (DLD), and typical development (TD), in order to assess classification accuracy and identify the variables that best differentiate between groups. Methods: Ninety-three children participated in a visual preference task that paired social and non-social stimuli, specifically designed to capture features characteristic of ASD. Participants were distributed across three groups: ASD ( Results: The model achieved an F1-score of 0.912 in distinguishing DLD from TD, 0.86 for ASD vs. TD, and 0.88 for the combined ASD+DLD group vs. TD. Performance was moderate for ASD vs. DLD, with an F1-score of 0.63. The most informative areas of interest were those broadly grouping social and non-social stimuli, while more specific variables did not improve classification accuracy. Naive Bayes and Logistic Model Trees (LMT) emerged as the most effective algorithms in this study. The resulting model enabled the identification of potential disorder-specific markers, such as the mean duration of visits to objects. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of applying XML techniques to eye-tracking data collected through tasks designed to capture features characteristic of neurodevelopmental conditions. They also underscore the clinical relevance of such approaches for identifying the variables and parameters that differentiate between disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.