Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630859›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Using explainable machine learning and eye-tracking for diagnosing autism spectrum and developmental language disorders in social attention tasks.

Adoración Antolí, Francisco Javier Rodriguez-Lozano, José Juan Cañas, Julia Vacas, Fátima Cuadrado, Araceli Sánchez-Raya, Carolina Pérez-Dueñas, Juan Carlos Gámez-Granados

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adoración AntolíDepartment of Psychology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Francisco Javier Rodriguez-LozanoDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School, University of Córdoba., Córdoba, Spain.
José Juan CañasMind, Brain and Behavioral Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Julia VacasDepartment of Psychology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Fátima CuadradoDepartment of Psychology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Araceli Sánchez-RayaDepartment of Psychology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Carolina Pérez-DueñasDepartment of Psychology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Juan Carlos Gámez-GranadosDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School, University of Córdoba., Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eye-tracking technology has proven to be a valuable tool in detecting visual scanning patterns associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Its advantages in easily obtaining reliable measures of social attention could help overcome many of the current challenges in the assessment of neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the clinical use of this technology has not yet been established. Two key challenges must be addressed: the difficulty in reliably distinguishing between disorders with overlapping features, and the efficient management of eye-tracking data to yield clinically meaningful outcomes. Purpose: The aim of this study is to apply explainable machine learning (XML) algorithms to eye-tracking data from social attention tasks involving children with ASD, developmental language disorder (DLD), and typical development (TD), in order to assess classification accuracy and identify the variables that best differentiate between groups. Methods: Ninety-three children participated in a visual preference task that paired social and non-social stimuli, specifically designed to capture features characteristic of ASD. Participants were distributed across three groups: ASD ( Results: The model achieved an F1-score of 0.912 in distinguishing DLD from TD, 0.86 for ASD vs. TD, and 0.88 for the combined ASD+DLD group vs. TD. Performance was moderate for ASD vs. DLD, with an F1-score of 0.63. The most informative areas of interest were those broadly grouping social and non-social stimuli, while more specific variables did not improve classification accuracy. Naive Bayes and Logistic Model Trees (LMT) emerged as the most effective algorithms in this study. The resulting model enabled the identification of potential disorder-specific markers, such as the mean duration of visits to objects. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of applying XML techniques to eye-tracking data collected through tasks designed to capture features characteristic of neurodevelopmental conditions. They also underscore the clinical relevance of such approaches for identifying the variables and parameters that differentiate between disorders.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disordercomputer-aided diagnosisdevelopmental language disorderdifferential diagnosisexplainable machine learningeye-tracking

Identifiers

PMID40630859
PMCPMC12236183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.