ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2025
TOWARDS PATIENT-SPECIFIC SURGICAL PLANNING FOR BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE REPAIR: FULLY AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION OF THE AORTIC VALVE IN 4D CT.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular CT in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: A State-of-the-Art Narrative Review of Advances, Clinical Integration, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- CT-based visualization of aortic valve morphology: from 3D energy-integrating CT to 4D photon counting CT.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most prevalent congenital heart defect and may require surgery for complications such as stenosis, regurgitation, and aortopathy. BAV repair surgery is effective but challenging due to the heterogeneity of BAV morphology. Multiple imaging modalities can be employed to assist the quantitative assessment of BAVs for surgical planning. Contrast-enhanced 4D computed tomography (CT) produces volumetric temporal sequences with excellent contrast and spatial resolution. Segmentation of the aortic cusps and root in these images is an essential step in creating patient-specific models for visualization and quantification. While deep learning-based methods are capable of fully automated segmentation, no BAV-specific model exists. Among valve segmentation studies, there has been limited quantitative assessment of the clinical usability of the segmentation results. In this work, we developed a fully automated multi-label BAV segmentation pipeline based on nnU-Net. The predicted segmentations were used to carry out surgically relevant morphological measurements including geometric cusp height, commissural angle and annulus diameter, and the results were compared against manual segmentation. Automated segmentation achieved average Dice scores of over 0.7 and symmetric mean distance below 0.7 mm for all three aortic cusps and the root wall. Clinically relevant benchmarks showed good consistency between manual and predicted segmentations. Overall, fully automated BAV segmentation of 3D frames in 4D CT can produce clinically usable measurements for surgical risk stratification, but the temporal consistency of segmentations needs to be improved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.