Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630824›Full record

ArticleNational science review2025

Selective facet etching enables dendrite-less molten salt aluminum metal batteries.

Meng Zhang, Xin Tong, Lujun Zhu, Fang Liu, Yongfeng Jia, Zhitong Xiao, Daohang Fu, Kang Han, Yu Wang, Hao Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Meng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xin TongState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Lujun ZhuState Key Laboratory of Advanced Waterproof Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Fang LiuState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Yongfeng JiaState Key Laboratory of Advanced Waterproof Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Zhitong XiaoState Key Laboratory of Advanced Waterproof Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Daohang FuHubei Longzhong Laboratory, Wuhan University of Technology (Xiangyang Demonstration Zone), Xiangyang 441000, China.
Kang HanState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Yu WangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Hao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Xuanpeng WangDepartment of Physical Science & Technology, School of Physics and Mechanics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jiashen MengState Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Quanquan PangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Waterproof Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aluminum metal batteries represent a promising alternative to lithium batteries for large-scale energy storage due to their high theoretical capacity, cost efficiency and improved safety features. However, a significant challenge lies in the polycrystalline surface nature of aluminum foil anodes, which can result in uneven aluminum deposition and increase the risk of a short circuit during cycling. Here we report a selective facet-etching method to construct a 3D porous aluminum anode (3D-Al) featuring near-single exposed (220) plane on the surface, enabling dendrite-free behavior and ultra-long cycling for aluminum batteries. The chemical etching mechanism is elucidated to showcase selective removal of the (111) and (200) planes, while preserving (220), which induces directional aluminum plating along the (220) plane. Further, the resulting 3D-Al anode possesses abundant pores and cavities, which serve as preferential sites for aluminum deposition, alleviating volume expansion and effectively inhibiting dendrite growth. The assembled 3D-Al||graphite battery displays excellent rate capability and an ultralong lifespan over 13 000 cycles at a high rate of 10.0 A g

Indexed as

aluminum batteryaluminum metal anodedendrite-free behaviormolten salt electrolyteselective facet etching

Identifiers

PMID40630824
PMCPMC12236164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.