ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
Machine Learning for 1-Year Mortality Prediction in Lung Transplant Recipients: ISHLT Registry.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in heart and lung transplantation.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning analysis identifies key predictors of baseline lung allograft dysfunction and increased mortality in lung transplant patients.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Transforming lung transplantation with artificial intelligence: a narrative review from organ allocation to post-transplant management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Shifting Determinants of Mortality Risk After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Identified by Machine Learning.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Hybrid Machine Learning Model to Predict Lung Transplant Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing lung transplant candidate selection is crucial for maximizing resource efficiency and improving patient outcomes. Using data from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) registry (29,364 patients), we developed a deep learning model to predict 1-year survival after lung transplantation. Initially, 25 pretransplant factors were identified, and their importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations values. We refined the model by selecting the top 10 most influential factors and compared its performance with the original model. Additionally, we conducted external validation using an independent in-house dataset. Among the 29,364 patients, 4,729 (16.1%) died within 1 year, while 24,635 survived. The Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model achieved the highest performance (AUC: 0.958, accuracy: 0.949). Notably, the streamlined model using only the top 10 factors maintained identical performance (AUC: 0.958, accuracy: 0.949). The in-house dataset used for external validation showed significant compositional differences compared to the ISHLT dataset. Despite these differences, the GBM model performed well (AUC: 0.852, accuracy: 0.764). Notably, the Multilayer Perceptron model demonstrated superior generalization with an AUC of 0.911 and accuracy of 0.870. Our machine learning-based approach effectively predicts 1-year mortality in lung transplant recipients using a minimal set of pretransplant factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.