Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630746›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

A Systematic Scoping Review of Patient-specific Devices in Operative Management of Scaphoid Nonunion.

Michael Roberts, Susie Lee, Amy Allen, Joshua Bloor, Rose Nicol, Eliza Whiteside, Vivek Shridhar, Paulomi Polly Burey, Tristan Shelley, Christopher Wall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael RobertsDepartment of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8339-5172
Susie LeeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5428-3052
Amy AllenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9407-3052
Joshua BloorDepartment of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1318-5409
Rose NicolCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-1683
Eliza WhitesideCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9710-7987
Vivek ShridharDepartment of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8295-1095
Paulomi Polly BureyCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9248-2307
Tristan ShelleyCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-0285
Christopher WallDepartment of Orthopaedics, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2446-5326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaphoid nonunion is a complication that occurs in 5-10% of patients who sustain an acute scaphoid fracture. There is no superior method for managing scaphoid nonunion that has been established in the current literature. The use of patient specific devices has been explored as a way to improve surgical management of scaphoid nonunion. 3D printing has made the production of patient specific devices more accessible. CT and MRI images can be used to model devices such as anatomic models and surgical guides. In this review we aim to discuss the current evidence for the use of patient specific devices for managing chronic scaphoid nonunion and demonstrate their different uses. A scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, existing patent applications, and grey literature was performed. Although the current research has demonstrated some possible benefits such as reduction in surgical time and accuracy of restoration of anatomy, further investigation with comparative studies is required to make conclusions about the superiority of these techniques over standard freehand techniques.

Identifiers

PMID40630746
PMCPMC12225989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.