ReviewJB & JS open access
Scholarly Success of Orthopaedic Surgeons Participating in Traveling Fellowships.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthopaedic traveling fellowship programs provide surgeons with valuable opportunities for professional growth and specialized learning. However, there has been limited research on the impact of such programs on scholarly success and career advancement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographic, academic, and scholarly outcomes of traveling fellowship participants. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of orthopaedic surgeons who participated in a traveling fellowship program from 1989 to 2024. Demographic and academic characteristics were collected for each traveling fellowship recipient, including residency program attended, fellowship specialty, fellowship institution, academic rank, current practice environment, and leadership roles. The Scopus database was used to determine individual H-indices and number of publications. Other characteristics included board position in a major orthopaedic society, National Institutes of Health (NIH) research funding, Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (OREF) grant recipient, advanced degrees, and editorial board position in an orthopaedic journal. Descriptive and regression statistics were used for the study. Results: Of the 558 physicians who participated in an orthopaedic traveling fellowship, demographic and academic information was available for 506 of them (90.7%). Of these, the majority (96.6%) only completed 1 traveling fellowship. Predominantly, recipients were male (90.7%) and White (79.1%) and had completed a sports fellowship (33.0%). Current practicing environment was often academic (76.5%), with most holding the rank of professor (51.0%). Seventy-two participants (14.2%) had a leadership role as chair and 48 (9.5%) were division chiefs. Participants had an average H-index of 35.7 and averaged 169.9 publications. One hundred seventy-three fellowship recipients (34.2%) received an OREF grant and 67 (13.2%) received NIH research funding. Fellowship participants who received an OREF grant or NIH funding were more likely to have a higher faculty rank, higher H-index, and an increase in the number of publications (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: The lessons, skills, and knowledge from traveling fellowships appear to play an important role in shaping the academic and scholarly career of orthopaedic surgeons. Level of Evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.