Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

PubPlant - a continuously updated online resource for sequenced and published plant genomes.

Rainer Schwacke, Marie E Bolger, Björn Usadel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rainer SchwackeForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-4 Bioinformatics, CEPLAS, BioSC, Jülich, Germany.
Marie E BolgerForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-4 Bioinformatics, CEPLAS, BioSC, Jülich, Germany.
Björn UsadelForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-4 Bioinformatics, CEPLAS, BioSC, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies over the last decade have substantially reduced the cost and effort required to sequence plant genomes. Whereas early efforts focused primarily on economically important crops and model species, attention has now turned to a broader range of plants, including those with larger and more complex genomes. In 2024, the genomes of 500 plant species were published, including 370 sequenced for the first time. Tracking and providing access to published plant genomes (now covering more than 1800 species) is an invaluable service for plant researchers. PubPlant is an online resource that serves this purpose by cataloging published plant genome sequences and offering multiple visualizations (https://www.plabipd.de/pubplant_main.html). It includes a chronology of genome publications, and cladograms to display the phylogenetic relationships among the sequenced plants. An overview diagram for seed plants highlights taxonomic orders and families with sequenced species and reveals those that have been overlooked thus far. As a use case for PubPlant, we evaluated the status of sequenced food crops. We found that the five plant families featuring the most food crops were those containing the most sequenced plant species.

Indexed as

Archaeplastidacladogramplant genome publicationsequenced plant genomestimeline

Identifiers

PMID40630734
PMCPMC12235464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.