ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Developing a framework for Swiss outpatient pediatric research network.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: In Switzerland, availability of pediatric outpatient data for research is limited. Pilot projects showed the benefits of collaborative networks for research, but there is no common understanding on how to best organize, govern, operate and fund these. This project aimed at developing a framework for the establishment of a nationwide collaborative outpatient pediatric research network. Methods: Following a qualitative approach, we conducted individual interviews, a workshop and a focus group with pediatricians and other healthcare stakeholders to discuss various aspects related to the development of the research network, including motivations for participation, retention strategies, perceived barriers, expected challenges, and previous experiences. Results: Participants were interested and willing to join such a network and gave valuable inputs, but also emphasized important challenges, particularly time constraints/limited resources, data management/IT infrastructure and funding. These insights allowed developing the outline of a three-step iterative implementation plan. Conclusions: The project emphasized key elements to consider for the development of a Swiss outpatient pediatric research network sustainable in the long term, that would mark a pivotal advancement for pediatric healthcare research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.