ArticleOncology letters2025
Differential extracellular matrix proteomic signatures in colorectal tumors from Appalachian and non-Appalachian patients.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence reports that regulation of the extracellular matrix influences the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study investigated regulation of the extracellular matrix proteome in colorectal malignancy within a high-risk Appalachian population compared with non-Appalachian populations. A targeted mass spectrometry imaging proteomic method directed at collagen regulation was used. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) comprising of matched CRC with adjacent normal to tumor (NAT) from 45 patients were constructed into 86 samples to evaluate the extracellular matrix proteome (ECM). A total of five specific peaks were discovered to differ between NAT and tumor with high sensitivity and specificity by receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) ≥0.7, Wilson/Brown P<0.0002. Evaluation of patient TMA cores showed increased levels of combined ECM peptides in advanced stage Appalachian CRC (III + IV) compared with early staged CRC (I + II) (AUROC 0.8595; 95% confidence interval, 0.8190-0.8999; Wilson/Brown P<1.0×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.