ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Multicenter Evaluation of Interpretable AI for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis from PET Biomarkers.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides multiple imaging biomarkers, often evaluated separately. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model integrating key clinical PET MPI parameters to improve the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: From 17,348 patients undergoing cardiac PET/CT across four sites, we retrospectively enrolled 1,664 subjects who had invasive coronary angiography within 180 days and no prior CAD. Deep learning was used to derive coronary artery calcium score (CAC) from CT attenuation correction maps. XGBoost machine learning model was developed using data from one site to detect CAD, defined as left main stenosis ≥50% or ≥70% in other arteries. The model utilized 10 image-derived parameters from clinical practice: CAC, stress/rest left ventricle ejection fraction, stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), ischemic and stress total perfusion deficit (TPD), transient ischemic dilation ratio, rate pressure product, and sex. Generalizability was evaluated in the remaining three sites-chosen to maximize testing power and capture inter-site variability-and model performance was compared with quantitative analyses using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Patient-specific predictions were explained using shapley additive explanations. Results: There was a 61% and 53% CAD prevalence in the training (n=386) and external testing (n=1,278) set, respectively. In the external evaluation, the AI model achieved a higher AUC (0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.85]) compared to clinical score by experienced physicians (0.80 [0.77-0.82], p=0.02), ischemic TPD (0.79 [0.77-0.82], p<0.001), MFR (0.75 [0.72-0.78], p<0.001), and CAC (0.69 [0.66-0.72], p<0.001). The models' performances were consistent in sex, body mass index, and age groups. The top features driving the prediction were stress/ischemic TPD, CAC, and MFR. Conclusion: AI integrating perfusion, flow, and CAC scoring improves PET MPI diagnostic accuracy, offering automated and interpretable predictions for CAD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.