Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630542›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Gaorav Gupta, Qinhong Wang, Simon Ellington, Paolo Guerra, Faeze Gharibpoor, Dennis Simpson, Min-Guk Cho, Adriana Beltran

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gaorav GuptaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0001-9177-552X
Qinhong WangUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Simon EllingtonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Paolo GuerraUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0001-8656-2298
Faeze GharibpoorUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Dennis SimpsonFCCC.
Min-Guk ChoUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Adriana BeltranUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Structural determinants of Pol theta functionP01CA247773 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DALE A RAMSDEN · 2020 to 2026
$15.2M
Mre11-Dependent DNA Damage Responses in Breast Cancer PathogenesisR37CA227837 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GUPTA, GAORAV P. · 2019 to 2025
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA247773NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS R37 CA227837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethality (SL) underlies the success of PARP1 inhibitors (PARPi) in treating homologous recombination (HR) deficient cancers, but extending this paradigm to other DNA damage response (DDR) deficiencies has proven challenging. We performed an in vivo CRISPR screen to identify DDR gene mutations that both enhance tumorigenesis and confer sensitivity to PARPi. Our screen identified FANCA deficiency as a driver of PARPi SL that was validated across diverse human cancer models. FANCA deficiency does not impair HR but disrupts Okazaki fragment maturation (OFM), causing lagging strand gaps and RPA exhaustion upon PARPi treatment. These effects require FANCA interaction with FEN1, independently of its canonical role in interstrand crosslink repair. We find FANCA-mediated FEN1 recruitment is required for OFM at oncogene-associated R loops during PARPi treatment. These findings establish a novel and non-canonical function for FANCA in FEN1-mediated OFM that can be leveraged for PARPi synthetic lethality in FANCA-mutant cancers.

Identifiers

PMID40630542
PMCPMC12236914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.