Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630499›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

DAPCy: a Python package for the discriminant analysis of principal components method for population genetic analyses.

Alejandro Correa Rojo, Pieter Moris, Hanne Meuwissen, Pieter Monsieurs, Dirk Valkenborg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandro Correa RojoData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek 3500, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5244-6384
Pieter MorisUnit of Malariology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp 2000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-4939
Hanne MeuwissenData Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek 3500, Belgium.
Pieter MonsieursUnit of Malariology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp 2000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2214-6652
Dirk ValkenborgFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol 2400, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: The Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components method is a pivotal tool in population genetics, combining principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis to assess the genetic structure of populations using genetic markers, focusing on the description of variation between genetic clusters. Despite its utility, the original R implementation in the adegenet package faces computational challenges with large genomic datasets. To address these limitations, we introduce DAPCy, a Python package leveraging the scikit-learn library to enhance the method's scalability and efficiency. DAPCy supports large datasets by utilizing compressed sparse matrices and truncated singular value decomposition for dimensionality reduction, coupled with training-test cross-validation for robust model evaluation. It also includes modules for Availability and implementation: DAPCy can be installed as a Python package through pip. Source code is available on https://gitlab.com/uhasselt-bioinfo/dapcy. Documentation and a tutorial can be found on https://uhasselt-bioinfo.gitlab.io/dapcy/.

Identifiers

PMID40630499
PMCPMC12237503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.