ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
2024 Guidelines on Patient Blood Management for Adult Cardiac Surgery Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass in China.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury following Stanford type A aortic dissection surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Multicenter external validation of the FW-TRIC score for predicting red blood cell transfusion in on-pump cardiac surgery.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Impact of an early, graduated mobilization program on recovery and postoperative outcomes after cardiac revascularization with extracorporeal circulation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Current perspectives and updates on transfusion strategies in critically ill anemic patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted Albumin Administration in Cardiac Surgery: Refining Perioperative Fluid Strategy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Working Group on Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Extracorporeal Life Support of China National Center for Cardiovascular Quality Improvement presents evidence-based guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. These guidelines aim to promote patient blood management programs, reduce blood loss and allogeneic transfusion, and improve patient outcomes. The Guidelines Panel includes multidisciplinary experts. Based on prior investigation and the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) principles, thirteen questions from four aspects were selected, including priming and fluid management during cardiopulmonary bypass, anticoagulation and monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass, peri-cardiopulmonary bypass blood product infusion, and autologous blood infusion. Systemic reviews of the thirteen questions were performed through literature research. Recommendations were generated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system and reviewed and refined by all the Guideline Panel members. A total of 19 recommendations were finally approved after five expert meetings between 2023 and 2024. By implementing these recommendations, perfusionists and medical staff involved in cardiac surgery can optimize patient blood management, effectively decrease allogeneic blood transfusion rates, minimize perioperative bleeding, and ultimately improve the prognosis in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.