ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Application of Machine Learning in the Prediction of the Acute Aortic Dissection Risk Complicated by Mesenteric Malperfusion Based on Initial Laboratory Results.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mesenteric malperfusion (MMP) represents a severe complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD). Research on risk identification models for MMP is currently limited. Methods: Based on a retrospective study of medical records from the Beijing Anzhen Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2022, we included 435 patients with AAD and allocated their data to training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. Key preoperative predictive variables were identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Subsequently, six machine learning algorithms were used to develop and validate an MMP risk identification model: logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). To determine the optimal model, the performance of the model was evaluated using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the Brier score. Results: LASSO regression identified white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum lactate levels, and arterial blood pH as key predictive variables. Among these, the WBC (OR 1.169, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086, 1.258; Conclusions: This study employed machine learning algorithms to develop a model capable of identifying MMP risk based on initial preoperative laboratory test results. This model can serve as a basis for making decisions in the treatment and diagnosis of MMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.