Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630437›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Application of Machine Learning in the Prediction of the Acute Aortic Dissection Risk Complicated by Mesenteric Malperfusion Based on Initial Laboratory Results.

Zhechuan Jin, Jiale Dong, Jian Yang, Chengxiang Li, Zequan Li, Zhaofei Ye, Yuyu Li, Ping Li, Yulin Li, Zhili Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhechuan JinDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3804-1172
Jiale DongDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3275-3791
Jian YangDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Chengxiang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Zequan LiDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Zhaofei YeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Yuyu LiBeijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Yulin LiBeijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Zhili JiDepartment of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6642-6652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mesenteric malperfusion (MMP) represents a severe complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD). Research on risk identification models for MMP is currently limited. Methods: Based on a retrospective study of medical records from the Beijing Anzhen Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2022, we included 435 patients with AAD and allocated their data to training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. Key preoperative predictive variables were identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Subsequently, six machine learning algorithms were used to develop and validate an MMP risk identification model: logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). To determine the optimal model, the performance of the model was evaluated using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the Brier score. Results: LASSO regression identified white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum lactate levels, and arterial blood pH as key predictive variables. Among these, the WBC (OR 1.169, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086, 1.258; Conclusions: This study employed machine learning algorithms to develop a model capable of identifying MMP risk based on initial preoperative laboratory test results. This model can serve as a basis for making decisions in the treatment and diagnosis of MMP.

Indexed as

acute aortic dissectionmachine learningmesenteric malperfusionprediction model

Identifiers

PMID40630437
PMCPMC12230842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.