ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Identification of Anticoagulation Benefit Subgroups of Patients With Left Ventricular Thrombus.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Anticoagulation represents the current primary management for LVT; however, current studies in some Asian populations suggest that the anticoagulation benefit in LVT patients is not significant. Given the heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes in LVT patients, the population of LVT patients who benefit from anticoagulation needs to be further explored. Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with LVT at the FuWai Hospital from 2009 to 2021. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) based on important clinical characteristics to objectively determine the number and dimensionality of clusters. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox analysis were used to explore the relationship between anticoagulation therapy and MACCEs and major bleeding events in LVT patients. Results: A total of 1085 patients were enrolled in this study, and during a median follow-up time of 36.5 months, 206 patients developed MACCEs, while 16 patients developed major bleeding events. Moreover, 1085 patients were categorized into four clusters following the LCA. In the adjusted model, the risk of MACCEs was significantly lower in LVT patients receiving anticoagulation in cluster 4 (hazard ratio (HR): 0.486, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.243-0.971) than in the group not receiving anticoagulation; however, there were no differences in the other three clusters or the whole population. There was a significant interaction between anticoagulation and the clustered subgroups ( Conclusions: Our study suggests that not all LVT patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy; younger LVT patients with fewer complications and more cardiomyopathies are more likely to benefit from anticoagulation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.