ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Alterations in CNS-derived blood biomarkers during 30 days simulated microgravity.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spaceflight induces physiological adaptations, including headward fluid shifts that may impact the central nervous system (CNS). Ground-based analogs such as 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) provide a controlled setting to study these neurophysiological effects and assess CNS biomarkers. We therefore analyzed neurological function and CNS-derived blood biomarkers during four NASA-backed 30-day strict HDTBR campaigns to better understand neurophysiological responses to prolonged fluid redistribution. Methods: Forty participants (18 women, 22 men; mean age ∼36 years) were assigned to different countermeasure groups: lower body negative pressure (LBNP), cycling in HDT followed by wearing thigh cuffs, upright sitting (positive control), and HDTBR without countermeasures. Neurological exams and blood biomarker analyses (SIMOA Quanterix) were performed to assess NfL, GFAP, Aβ Results: No clinical neurological impairments were observed. The LBNP group exhibited robust increases in amyloid-related biomarkers during HDTBR, which persisted into the recovery period. Analysis of within-subject changes over time revealed additional effects. In the cycling and cuffs group, NFL levels increased progressively throughout the study. In the control group, GFAP levels rose gradually, indicating mild glial activation. Tau protein also increased in the LBNP group but returned to baseline levels during the recovery phase. Discussion: These findings highlight subtle but biologically relevant CNS-related changes in response to different countermeasure strategies during 30-day strict HDTBR. LBNP may enhance metabolite clearance, as reflected in increased Aβ washout. These findings support the use of LBNP as a potential countermeasure to protect brain health during spaceflight and analog missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.