ArticleERJ open research2025
Surgical lung biopsy analyses differ by race and ethnicity in interstitial lung disease.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial, Ethnic, Sex, and Gender Equity for Inclusive Interstitial Lung Disease Research: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Race and ethnicity in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases: what do these categories contribute in the clinical setting?ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aim: Establishing an interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis may require surgical lung biopsy (SLB). While prior studies have described the epidemiology of ILDs among different races and ethnicities, the pathological and clinical diagnoses based on SLBs associated with these demographics are unexplored. Methods: We reviewed SLBs performed between 2000 and 2022 at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and the University of Chicago (UChicago) assessing histopathology using structured data collection forms. We analysed differences in histopathological features among White, Black, Asian, Hispanic and Native American participants. Results: A total of 1100 patients (899 UCSF and 201 UChicago study subjects, respectively) with chronic ILD underwent SLBs. 80.6% of patients were White, 6.7% Black, 5.7% Asian, 5% Hispanic and 1.9% Native American. The mean age was 61 years, with Black participants being younger (53 years). Notable histopathological differences include higher frequency of germinal centre formation in Black participants who also had less microscopic honeycombing, and less frequency of organising pneumonia in Hispanic participants. Hispanic participants had pathological nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) whereas Native American participants mostly had fibrosing interstitial pneumonia. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) was the most common clinical diagnosis in White and Hispanic participants, connective tissue disease-ILD in Black participants and unclassifiable ILD in Native American participants. HP and NSIP frequently require SLB. Conclusions: This study demonstrates significant racial and ethnic differences in pathological and clinical diagnoses among ILDs. Recognising these differences is critical for tailoring diagnostic approaches and may impact precision medicine approaches for ILD management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.