ArticleERJ open research2025
Real-world usage and response to gefapixant in refractory chronic cough.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Purinergic signaling in osteoarthritis: Mechanistic insights into pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Endpoints in cough studies: learnings from the ERS Cough Conference.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- ATP-P2X3 Signaling as a Shared Neural Sensitization Pathway in Endometriosis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- KAAACI Consensus Document on the Goals and Standards of Chronic Cough Clinics in Korea: A Delphi Study.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Positive allosteric modulator activity of ginsenosides is restricted to P2X7 and P2X4 receptors.Purinergic signalling · 2026Article
- Observational
- Female predominance in chronic cough: biological sex-related factors, mechanisms, and therapeutic targets-a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of the P2XJournal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Disease finds its identity with treatment in the real world: the use of gefapixant in chronic cough.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- How Will a Treatable Traits Approach Reshape Clinical Practice in Chronic Cough?Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Review
- Dupilumab reduces patient-reported cough and improves quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with or without chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a real-life prospective study.Drugs in context · 2025Article
- Clinical Experience With Gefapixant in a Specialized Chronic Cough Clinic: Navigating the P2X3 Pathway.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The real-world efficacy of the P2X3 antagonist gefapixant, a new class of antitussive for refractory chronic cough, is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world usage and response to gefapixant in patients with refractory chronic cough. Methods: This multicentre retrospective study involved patients with refractory chronic cough who visited cough clinics and were prescribed gefapixant. Data collected included baseline demographics, cough characteristics, response to gefapixant, degree of taste disturbance (both assessed by cough specialists), and the course of cough after discontinuation, if applicable. Results: 272 cases were analysed. The population was predominantly middle-aged females, with most patients having asthmatic cough as a comorbidity, dry cough, and predominantly daytime cough. Half of the patients reported a response rate of ≥5 on a 0-10 scale, with 25% reporting a response rate of ≥8. Among responders (response rate ≥5), improvement was largely seen within 2 weeks. The median treatment duration with gefapixant was 32 days (interquartile range 14-175 days), with longer treatment periods observed in responders. Responders typically had more severe pre-treatment cough, dry cough, asthmatic cough as a comorbidity and specific laryngeal sensations. In patients who discontinued gefapixant, sustained improvement was observed in responders. Taste disturbance was not associated with response to gefapixant and was less frequent in patients with cough triggers such as smoke, dry air, or scents, than in those without these triggers. Conclusions: Gefapixant demonstrated a rapid and effective antitussive effect in this multicentre, real-world study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.