ArticleERJ open research2025
Predictors of asthma exacerbation between high and low blood eosinophil counts.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of type 2 inflammation-related biomarkers in risk prediction models for acute exacerbations in adult asthma: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy for Cough Variant Asthma: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite treatment advances, managing asthma remains challenging owing to variability in response across different type 2 inflammation phenotypes. We aimed to compare the differences in pre-treatment profiles related to 12-month asthma exacerbation in patients with baseline high and low blood eosinophil count (BEC) levels. Methods: This study included 438 and 231 patients with asthma with pre-treatment BEC levels >300 cells·μL Results: Baseline characteristics, including impaired lung function, female sex and sensitivity to stress as an asthma trigger were important predictors of exacerbation in both BEC groups. Significant characteristics related to exacerbation in the high-BEC group included high pre-treatment BEC levels, history of smoking, sensitivity to tobacco smoke and allergic-related conditions. In contrast, key characteristics associated with exacerbation in the low-BEC group included high baseline peripheral neutrophil counts, current smokers, history of tuberculosis and the use of long-acting β2 agonists plus long-acting muscarinic agonists. The prediction model for 12-month exacerbation using baseline characteristics had stronger predictive power in the low-BEC group than the high-BEC group. Conclusion: The exacerbation profiles of patients with asthma with high and low pretreatment BEC levels share some common characteristics despite substantial differences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.